Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

[Jim Jagielski]

Ben Hyde wrote:
> 
> To repeat all these inform the debate, they are a list
> of things to think about, but we don't have and don't
> want some objective scoring scheme for these; the
> public debate process while tedious is good - particularly
> when we all remain gentlemenly.
> 

Here here. My intent was not scoring, but rather, as you said,
an honest *discussion* of the module, and some topics that
should be discussed about it. I just don't want us to not do
What's Right in this case simply because of the emotions
that the debate caused.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
                   will lose both and deserve neither"