Greg Stein wrote:
> When you say placeholder, are you suggesting that you're going to commit the
> code back into the httpd-2.0 branch?
Yes - in the last (long) discussion it got the needed +1's, but it was
never done.
I've delayed actually committing the thing yet to make sure people have
time to complain about me doing it :)
> Rather than doing that, why don't we work on the rollup mechanism instead?
> Proxy has been moving along terrifically while in its own CVS module.
We can do this too - but then I'd say we would need to finalise the
rollup release issue before we can go GA. Who is willing to sort out the
rollup release?
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
