Re: what about proxy? (was: Re: General Availability release qualities?)

[Chuck Murcko]

On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, at 04:01 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:

>> Rather than doing that, why don't we work on the rollup mechanism 
>> instead?
>> Proxy has been moving along terrifically while in its own CVS module.
>
> We can do this too - but then I'd say we would need to finalise the
> rollup release issue before we can go GA. Who is willing to sort out the
> rollup release?
>

Most of the stuff to build a rollup release is already running in the 
proxy builds.

Chuck