On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:15:57AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I thought we decided not to rely on -D SSL anymore, or am I mistaken? > If that 'feature' is needed (and they don't know how to uncomment the > LoadModule directive, or they are a static build) I suppose we could > introduce the obverse, -D NOSSL, to let folks hobble along while they > are fixing their config.
Why not <IfModule mod_ssl.c>? Or, do we want them to explicitly enable it by some action? Why not just have those lines commented out in ssl-std.conf, but protected by <IfModule>? -- justin
