On Wednesday 31 October 2001 08:20 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:15:57AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > I thought we decided not to rely on -D SSL anymore, or am I mistaken? > > If that 'feature' is needed (and they don't know how to uncomment the > > LoadModule directive, or they are a static build) I suppose we could > > introduce the obverse, -D NOSSL, to let folks hobble along while they > > are fixing their config. > > Why not <IfModule mod_ssl.c>? Or, do we want them to explicitly > enable it by some action? Why not just have those lines commented > out in ssl-std.conf, but protected by <IfModule>? -- justin
Because IfModule doesn't help if you have a static build with SSL. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
