On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:06:55AM -0500, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > Compiles and installs fine on HP-UX !!.. I did some minimal tests and it > passes.. +1 for beta (ofcourse, i'd have loved to have the SSL session > caching stuff in the beta itself, but if it requires more time for review, > it's fine with me)..
Yeah, I'd like to play around with alternatives to the SSL caching stuff later this week (i.e. a new APR API for accessing shmem that treats it as a fixed-length hash/DBM). I've got a midterm tomorrow I need to study for, so once that is out of the way, I should have time to tackle this. As I mentioned in STATUS (perhaps you missed it), I'm -0 on your patch because it is way too complex for my liking and I think we can solve it another way in a much cleaner way. But, I'm not sure of the specifics yet. -- justin
