On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:29:43AM -0500, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > Also, I always thought it was good to seperate the SHM management from SSL > caching (so that other modules can use the SHM api's if needed).. But, I'd > definitely be interested in knowing more about your alternatives..
I think Justin is going in the other direction -- your proposed changes need to be broken down into finer grained proposals/functionality. I'd rather see us leave the apr_shm stuff that's in there right now, and then add your proposed freelist management code as an alternative or supplement to our barebones apr_shm. That way we don't add unnecessary overhead for code that's already using apr_shm, and we can still move ahead with other shared data types which will eventually lead to other forms of ssl session cache. -aaron
