On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > I should clarify that just destroying the subrequest should be > perfectly safe. Have we tried that yet. In the past, we would have > had a problem with data surviving the death of the request, but all > buckets should have cleanups now, so that shouldn't be an issue.
Hang on... you do have to explicitly setaside all the buckets you want to keep before destroying the subrequest and tell it which pool you want them setaside into. Buckets don't have cleanups (well, pool buckets do, but none of the others do), they have setaside functions. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
