On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > We are talking about destroying the sub request. By the time this is > done, we have already passed all of the data from the sub-requests > filter stack to the original requests. Either all of the data was > written to the network, or it was set-aside. If it was written to the > network, we can ignore it. If it was set aside, then it was done so > in the original request, so we passed r->pool or c->pool to the > setaside function.
[thinks for a minute] Yeah, that does sound right. Bottom line is that core_output_filter is (or should be) taking care of all this for us. Okay, +1. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
