On Wednesday 14 November 2001 06:10 pm, sterling wrote: > Hi - > > I am not too familiar with the OLD_WRITE filter, but I have run into an > interesting situation. I want to ensure that my filter is before any of > the FTYPE_CONTENT filters. The only way to do this is to make mine > FTYPE_CONTENT-1. However, OLD_WRITE assumes (since it is set as > FTYPE_CONTENT-1) that it is the first filter in output_filters (and then > assumes that in fact it is the first one without checking). > > Maybe OLD_WRITE should be set to 0 (or AP_FTYPE_FIRST or something) so you > can have more fine grained filter ordering. Here is a patch that > implements that (and also gets rid of an assumption in buffer_output). > > As I said, not sure if this is the right fix, any suggestions (MAYBE an > FTYPE_FIRST instead of FTYPE_CONTENT-1)?
The OLD_WRITE filter is a CONTENT filter, so I am leaving it with that type, but to allow some space to manuver, I changed it to FTYPE_CONTENT - 10. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
