On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2001 06:10 pm, sterling wrote: > > Hi - > > > > I am not too familiar with the OLD_WRITE filter, but I have run into an > > interesting situation. I want to ensure that my filter is before any of > > the FTYPE_CONTENT filters. The only way to do this is to make mine > > FTYPE_CONTENT-1. However, OLD_WRITE assumes (since it is set as > > FTYPE_CONTENT-1) that it is the first filter in output_filters (and then > > assumes that in fact it is the first one without checking). > > > > Maybe OLD_WRITE should be set to 0 (or AP_FTYPE_FIRST or something) so you > > can have more fine grained filter ordering. Here is a patch that > > implements that (and also gets rid of an assumption in buffer_output). > > > > As I said, not sure if this is the right fix, any suggestions (MAYBE an > > FTYPE_FIRST instead of FTYPE_CONTENT-1)? > > The OLD_WRITE filter is a CONTENT filter, so I am leaving it with that type, > but to allow some space to manuver, I changed it to FTYPE_CONTENT - 10.
which happens to be 0 (what my patch had) sterling
