Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:24:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> ...
> > This adds a HardServerLimit directive to prefork which allows you to
> > set a really big* limit on MaxClients (if you can spare the shared
> > memory). As always, you get to play with MaxClients across restarts
> > but you can't play with HardServerLimit.
>
> s/HardServerLimit/SoftServerLimit/ ? I'm only suggesting this since
> the semantics of HARD_SERVER_LIMIT != HardServerLimit.
I hear what you're saying but I am not crazy about
"SoftServerLimit"/"SoftThreadLimit". Somebody please +1 Aaron's
suggestion and I'll eagerly comply! (Maybe I'll comply anyway... just
not comfortable yet...)
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
