> From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57
> The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed > connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that > wrong? Which is what I saw first too. But when I talked to Ian over irc <snippet>: [00:22] <IanHolsman> hey.. did you see the benchmark.. [00:22] <IanHolsman> could you parse it [00:22] <sander> Yes, saw it. [00:22] <sander> No, could not parse. [00:22] <IanHolsman> aah [00:23] <IanHolsman> http://webperf.org/a2/caw/29/Current Total HTTP and TCP Errors vs Load 21-Dec-2001 1215.gif is probably the best image [00:24] <sander> Under a higher load we get more errors with v30? [00:24] <IanHolsman> if you look on v29 errors start happening around 500 users sessions. with v30 they happen at 700 [00:24] <IanHolsman> no... under a higher load you get less. [00:24] <sander> Ah And this is why I thought this morning: "There must be more people having trouble parsing these results...". > david Sander
