From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:28 PM
> So I says to myself, "self, why introduce the ThreadLimit directive when the >scoreboard on > Windows is not shared between processes, ever?". So here is a patch: the scoreboard >is > always allocated to be exactly big enough for ThreadsPerChild entries. And it can >grow or > shrink across restarts because the scoreboard is never shared across processes. Why >didn't > I think o this sooner? It's late so posting a patch rather than committing code... So I read your patch... and think; we need a shared scoreboard, if we are ever going to introduce multiple processes on Windows. The 'let a child gracefully die, but start up yet another right away' logic really starts to prove we need more robust mpm on Win32. So I'm very -1 on breaking the HARD_THREAD_LIMIT on win32, since it only needs to be re-added later, once I introduce a shared scoreboard :( Bill
