From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 6:57 AM
> "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So I says to myself, "self, why introduce the ThreadLimit directive when the >scoreboard on > > Windows is not shared between processes, ever?". So here is a patch: the >scoreboard is > > always allocated to be exactly big enough for ThreadsPerChild entries. And it can >grow or > > shrink across restarts because the scoreboard is never shared across processes. >Why didn't > > I think o this sooner? It's late so posting a patch rather than committing code... > > it makes sense to me, but what do I know about the NT MPM? (answer: > almost nothing)... but it either works or it doesn't, so commit it > already if it does No... thanks for taking the time to post the patch, Bill! Since it would interfere with moving the WinNT port twords a more scaleable solution, I'm glad to have a chance to comment, instead of asking for the code to be reverted. On your other [earlier] always-single-process patch, it's just as well that we simplified the MPM first, so that making the code more APR-based [first!] became a more trivial task :) Bill
