On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:31:04AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Regarding the setpgid manpages on various platforms, it seems that
> the second 0 indicates that the pid==pgid and that pid becomes the
> session leader. I'm not sure how that is incorrect here. This
> call should be occurring before the fork, so that sounds correct
> to me. What exactly is suspicious here? -- justin
As I stated in my previous mail, I misunderstood this, my bad, sorry for the
false alert.
Interestingly in the Samba code the setsid() call comes _after_ the fork()
(see my previous e-mail) and that seems to work just fine. So it looks like
the order suggested is not an absolute requirement; any thoughts on this?
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
