> -----Original Message----- > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: UseCanonicalName considered harmful > > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > Shouldn't we fix the canonicalisation then? If you have > > configured your server so that it can't be reached through > > the canonical name, then you have an incorrect config. > > ServerName foo > Listen 30000 > > You're saying that this is incorrect and invalid?
Not at all. I am saying that in this case, the canonical name should be: foo:30000/ not: foo/ On the other hand, the config: ServerName foo:80 Listen 30000 Would have the canonical name: foo/ And, if it couldn't be reached at foo/, then that isn't a config we need to worry about. Ryan
