> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > > > Shouldn't we fix the canonicalisation then? If you have > > > configured your server so that it can't be reached through > > > the canonical name, then you have an incorrect config. > > > > ServerName foo > > Listen 30000 > > > > You're saying that this is incorrect and invalid? > > Not at all. I am saying that in this case, the canonical name should > be: > > foo:30000/ I may be missing the point here, but I think Ken's configuration example is invalid. It should be 2.0: ServerName foo:3000 Listen 3000 or 1.3: ServerName foo Port 3000 Listen 3000 Jsohua.
