> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:44:22AM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > ServerName MyServer.Com > > Listen 10000 > > Listen 20000 > > Canonical name should be: MyServer.Com:<port-used-by-the-request> > > It's this case that makes me think we should just rename ServerName to > something like CanonicalServerName and require that it always be of the > form "servername:port". > > It is useful for Apache to report itself running on a different port > than it's listening, but I don't see how we can do that with the > proposed changes. The typical use case for this is an apache server
why don't you think that is possible with these changes? Right now, if you don't specify a port in the ServerName directive, we use the default port for the protocol. All we are saying, is if you don't specify a port (i.e. you don't want to use a special port), use the same port that the original request used. Ryan
