On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:59:50AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: > why don't you think that is possible with these changes? Right now, if > you don't specify a port in the ServerName directive, we use the default > port for the protocol. All we are saying, is if you don't specify a > port (i.e. you don't want to use a special port), use the same port that > the original request used.
D'oh -- I totally skipped the use cases that make this obvious. That's what I get for posting so early in the morning. In that case, and as long as I can specify the exact hostname:port, then I am +1. -aaron
