On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 02:51:43PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: > You're right; the apr_proc_mutex_t won't be sufficient in this > case. We'll really need apr_global_mutex_t for this. If that's > going to be available soon, I'll switch the rewrite code to use > it when it's released; but if not, I'll revert to the old lock > API for now.
I'm working on it right now, and I may have it on unix in the next hour or two. -aaron