On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 02:51:43PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> You're right; the apr_proc_mutex_t won't be sufficient in this
> case.  We'll really need apr_global_mutex_t for this.  If that's
> going to be available soon, I'll switch the rewrite code to use
> it when it's released; but if not, I'll revert to the old lock
> API for now.

I'm working on it right now, and I may have it on unix in the next hour or
two.

-aaron

Reply via email to