* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

>> hmm, how is it? Is a fulfilled 2.0 backport vote sufficient to port
>> it back  to 1.3 or would I need another voting?
> 
> Is the change the same?  Would the same patch apply to 2.0 as to 1.3?
> If so, then I think you'd be safe.

Exactly the same change and patch, apart from the line numbers ...
Well, I think, I'll put it in, if there are no upcoming objections.

> If it'd require more tweaking,
> then I think you'd be best off asking for another vote (after posting
> the 1.3-specific changes).

Okay, sounds fair :)

nd
-- 
print "Just Another Perl Hacker";

# André Malo, <http://pub.perlig.de/> #

Reply via email to