On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > MAJOR code change to a large part of the code (Ryan, if you did not, > > then my apologies on naming you. IE the per-child MPM stuff). > The scariest thing about this conversation is that it was sparked by a > commit that added two comments. Even worse, those two comments > essentially suggested a way to move forward on a bug that many people > have filed bugs about. And finally, the comments didn't say anything > about how pervasive the changes would be.
The two comments mentioned that the "PerChild MPM" is to be "re-written". Which was interpreted as a rewrite of the entire MPM code base. If it only requires changes in the "Per Child" MPM and no changes in the general MPM codebase, I do not think people will complain. In some sense PerChild has been broken for a long time and probably should be considered experimental. Cheers, -- Sander van Zoest [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Diego, CA, US http://Sander.vanZoest.com/
