"Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Fair enough, but as I understand matters, Scarab does not support any
>>> migration path from GNATS->Scarab, but does from Bugzilla->Scarab.
>>> So, all of this work/rearrangment won't be lost if we decide to
>>> switch to Scarab? It'll be painless, right?
>>
>> Right, also because we have another 20 or something projects to move across,
>> and I don't want to waste my life over it... It will be painless, and
>> everything done in Bugzilla will be ported to Scarab... I was only thinking
>> about the name (bugzilla.apache.org won't be a good name if we run the
>> competitor product :)
>
> A CNAME like issues.apache.org would be reasonable regardless of
> implementing issue tracking system. Interfaces are great.
+1 ...
Pier
