> > but the second has me stumped. If the user aborts the connection we > > shouldn't log 200, but I don't know what is correct. Ryan and I decided > > to use 206 for now. Can I get some opinions on the correct value? > > IMO, the access log should *always* reflect the status code that was (or > would have been) sent to the client, regardless of whether the client > aborted the transaction. Noting that the client aborted the transaction > is the error log's job.
I am more than happy with that argument. I will change the second return to APR_SUCCESS, and commit. Ryan
