On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> But an apr_status_t is far more descriptive of what went wrong in the filter
> stack, and it doesn't bind filters as tightly to HTTP server applications.
> I know there was a great deal of interest in using them in a client, and
> there will certainly be other network applications over time.

True...

--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Charlottesville, VA


Reply via email to