At 01:49 PM 4/5/2002, you wrote: >+1. Just finished the test and it checks out OK.
BTW, the resulting argv[0..n-1] must have a terminating argv[n] == NULL ... but you knew that of course, and I presume it remains :) Bill
At 01:49 PM 4/5/2002, you wrote: >+1. Just finished the test and it checks out OK.
BTW, the resulting argv[0..n-1] must have a terminating argv[n] == NULL ... but you knew that of course, and I presume it remains :) Bill