At 01:34 PM 4/5/2002, you wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Ugly, but logically it looks right:
>
>Ouch. Yeah, I'd wondered about that problem. The thing is it seems
>really silly to me to be fighting with finding the '\0' when we already
>know how many loop iterations it should be ('cause we counted them :).
For one very SIMPLE reason. Changing the logic between the allocation
and execution phase is just ASKING for gp faults down the road.
Staying with consistent logic, we are -certain- that what we allocated
is what we about to write.
