+1 > Just in case, I'll do it, if only to make sure it gets done if the group > thinks it's a valid solution. > > -- > =========================================================================== > Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson >
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe critical Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe cri... Bill Stoddard
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe... Jim Jagielski
- RE: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to desc... Ryan Bloom
- Libtool liaison (Was: RE: 2.0.35 for Da... Jim Jagielski
- RE: Libtool liaison (Was: RE: 2.0.... Bill Stoddard
- RE: Libtool liaison (Was: RE: ... Sander Striker
- RE: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe cri... Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to desc... Jim Jagielski
- RE: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to ... Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: wher... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: ... Aaron Bannert
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was ... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was ... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was ... Aaron Bannert