Aaron Bannert wrote: > > I would be willing to spend more time with the primary developers to > get wider and more up-to-date platform support. In that respect, we > and the libtool developers have the same goals; and that effort would > be lost if we branched our own libtool or started from scratch. >
Except if libtool is overkill for what we need. Sure, I'm willing to continue to try to "work" with the libtool developers, and hope that we can come to a good working relationship. In the meantime, I don't see the harm is doing a good review of what we are using libtool for (is it just figuring out how to handle shared libs/DSOs?) just in case... as mentioned, I'm sure there's not a consensus on why exactly we're using libtool. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
