--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:23:47PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > >
> > > I would HAPPILY contribute to a project to re-write libtool. IMNSHO, it
> > > is the absolute worst tool ever created.
> > Same here... :)
>
> I wouldn't. I think libtool, for all it's troubles, saves us lots of
> development time and hassles that we are just blind to. One of those
> things that we only bitch at when it breaks. :)
Does it really do all that much. I.e. what is wrong with
gcc -o httpd `find . -name "*.c" -print`
:-) Seriously - we are using libtool for hardly a thing.
Dw
- RE: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe critical Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe cri... Pier Fumagalli
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe... Jim Jagielski
- RE: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to desc... Ryan Bloom
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to ... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: wher... Aaron Bannert
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: ... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: ... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: ... Aaron Bannert
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: ... Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: ... dirkx
- Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to ... Jon Travis
