At 12:24 PM -0400 4/26/02, Jeff Trawick wrote: >Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > +1 to either option. Enabled by default is probably okay since it will >> > help us track down problems, so I'll lean toward --disable-atomic. >> >> Although I'd really like to see the atomics code work, having to >> specify --please-make-my-binaries-portable is not good enough for me. :( >> Optimizations that narrow the scope of portability must be optional. > >I thought this thread was in regards to the compile issues that >various folks have had on Solaris and Linux, not the binary build >issue... >
Yeah, that was the intent of my orig email... 2 separate issues, but the main for me was the build problems preventing a 2.0.36 from happening. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
