I'm more in favour of diabled by default and a switch to enable. If 2.0.36 does look good then binaries will be required (given we have binaries for .35) and I'd rather we avoided too many issues. 2.0.37 won't be far away and maybe we'll have fixed it by then.
david ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:10 PM Subject: Re: Atomics in general > Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Maybe we should have atomics disabled by default, at least right > > now... with the build problems on some Linuxes and the Solaris > > compatibility stuff, it's been snagging us. I don't want it to > > delay 2.0.36 if possible. > > I could go for that or for a --disable-atomic switch which could be > used to alleviate any problems if they happen. > > -- > Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Born in Roswell... married an alien... >
