Cliff Woolley wrote: >On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>T-1200 >>If I don't see any agreement that this is the way to go, I'll be happy >>to revert to the original mmn bump. >> > > >Bump the major. For the first couple of releases I don't see a big >problem with that. Note that with 1.3.x, the major was bumped many times >between the alphas and the final major that we still use today, which >didn't come about until 1.3.5. 1.3.1, 1.3.2, and 1.3.4 all changes in the >major. >
I'm not comfortable with bumping the major number. We shouldn't be inflicting a major number change (and the consequent need to rebuild one's modules) on third party module suppliers without a damn good reason, and I just don't see anything in 2.0.36 that qualifies. --Brian
