On 6 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > jerenkrantz 02/05/06 01:21:10 > > Modified: include ap_mmn.h > Log: > Removing a field in a core structure (r->boundary) merits a MMN bump, > unfortunately. They got 2 GAs out of the old MMN. > > Reviewed by: Cliff Woolley
If people end up objecting to this (I'm sure they will :-P), we *could* just leave a dummy field in the middle of the request_rec. It seems awfully silly to me to start leaving cruft in the structures this early in the 2.0 cycle, though. I suggest that we leave this bump in there for now, and if other changes come about that also could take advantage of an MMN bump, we won't feel too bad about it. If we get to release time and this was the only change, we can consider sticking in a dummy var as a *temporary* measure at that time. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
