Sounds good. +1 on this. I'm curious about always failing if setsid() fails... We are smarter than that in 2.0...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > http://www.catnook.com/patches/apache-1.3.24-daemontools.patch > > > > is valid. To the point, however, the bug says to simply place in > > ./patches, but I'm wondering whether we should just fold it into > > the official source. That's what I'm leaning towards... Any complaints > > if, after review and test, we do that?? > > My intention was to review, test and fold into the core. > > Dw > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
