At 12:11 PM 5/23/2002, you wrote: >Here is the commit message for using xcopy: > >"Tired of 'foo.h not found' messages in the build. Checked ms's docs, > seems xcopy's /y arg goes all the way back to Win95. This shouldn't > introduce any hassles."
I know... but Win95 was after NT 4.0's cmd processor. [Yes they succeeded in substantially creating NT 4.0 before introducing the sad 9x series, wasting millions of development hours on a now-dead OS line.] The patch to foo around with COPYCMD [which does/doesn't work on 9x? I have to check...] really looks like overkill. Bill; I can't find a bootable NT4.0 partition at the moment, could you email me just the output of copy /? > help xcopy /? >> help so I can review? [If they are sent to stderr, use 2> instead of >] Thx, Bill
