On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 11:04, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 26 May 2002 19:34 > > > On Sun, 26 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > >>> True, but it does _depend_ on httpd. I'd like to hear a few other > >>> people's opinions on [the pools patches]. So far it seems to be tied > >>> up in terms of 2.0.37: Sander "for", Brian "against", and me > >>> undecided. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see Brian say he is against. > His benchmarks show that the patch doesn't affect httpd performance, > so I don't really get where this is comming from. Can someone point > me to a message ID?
I didn't yet cast a vote. So, -0 for including the pool fix in 2.0.37 +1 for including it in 2.0.38. --Brian
