Sander Striker wrote: >>From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: 26 May 2002 19:34 > > >>On Sun, 26 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >> >>>>True, but it does _depend_ on httpd. I'd like to hear a few other >>>>people's opinions on [the pools patches]. So far it seems to be tied >>>>up in terms of 2.0.37: Sander "for", Brian "against", and me >>>>undecided. >>> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see Brian say he is against. > His benchmarks show that the patch doesn't affect httpd performance, > so I don't really get where this is comming from. Can someone point > me to a message ID? > > Furthermore, you left Ian out of the loop, who was +1 IIRC.
yep. i'm ++1 even. we have a internal app which depends on this functionality as well. it would be nice if they could just use a plain APR instead of a hacked up one. > >>--Cliff > > > Sander >
