Somebody remind me why that ap_status_drops_conn call was added in the
first place?  It was a recent change, and seemed important at the time.

--Cliff




On 20 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> gregames    2002/06/20 12:34:29
>
>   Modified:    modules/http http_request.c
>   Log:
>   prevent infinite recursion if an ErrorDocument gets an error
>
>   Reported by: Colm MacCrthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.148     +1 -1      httpd-2.0/modules/http/http_request.c
>
>   Index: http_request.c
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/http/http_request.c,v
>   retrieving revision 1.147
>   retrieving revision 1.148
>   diff -u -r1.147 -r1.148
>   --- http_request.c  10 Jun 2002 22:02:57 -0000      1.147
>   +++ http_request.c  20 Jun 2002 19:34:28 -0000      1.148
>   @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
>         * error condition, we just report on the original error, and give up on
>         * any attempt to handle the other thing "intelligently"...
>         */
>   -    if (r->status != HTTP_OK && !ap_status_drops_connection(type)) {
>   +    if (r->status != HTTP_OK) {
>            recursive_error = type;
>
>            while (r->prev && (r->prev->status != HTTP_OK))
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to