On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:41:51PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > Somebody remind me why that ap_status_drops_conn call was added in the > first place? It was a recent change, and seemed important at the time.
Woah, woah, woah. Please revert. If the status results in a dropped connection, we can't read the body because that status code means we don't trust the input. This also means that the r->status code can not be the recursive code (which doesn't result in a dropped connection), but must remain the error that we just got in ap_die, so that we know that we're not supposed to read the body. This is central to our 413 fixes. Please find another way to fix this. -- justin
