> This PR points out a problem with the current SSLMutex handling in > mod_ssl and provides a patch to resolve it. > > I'd rather see a different solution: > > 1) give SSLMutex the same syntax as AcceptMutex, except that SSLMutex > has an additional choice: none. > 2) add SSLMutexFile which is processed like the LockFile directive > > This is a migration problem for people using 2.0.x with mod_ssl, but > for the long term I suspect it will be beneficial not to bundle the > optional lock file name with the mutex mechanism. > > Comments?
++1. Ryan
