Date: 31 Jul 2002 12:12:47 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SSLMutex directive, PR 8122
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> This PR points out a problem with the current SSLMutex handling in
> mod_ssl and provides a patch to resolve it.

Nice to see someone noticing it.

> I'd rather see a different solution:
>
> 1) give SSLMutex the same syntax as AcceptMutex, except that SSLMutex
> has an additional choice: none.

This is not so different. I proposed as well the same syntax as AcceptMutex. But I 
retained more backwards compatibility having the choices none/no, default/yes, sem and 
file.

Anyway you are right the file: choice is awkward and inconsistent with other options. 
How about using my path, BTW I have a new one for 2.0.39 if anyone is interested, but 
issuing a deprectation warning for the file: choice?

> 2) add SSLMutexFile which is processed like the LockFile directive

Good idea.

Masi 

Reply via email to