Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > with the recent fix to apr_poll's memory leak we can start this ball > rolling again..
We'll need to state that it can't be used with > x Listen statements or explain how to build APR to allow more descriptors with no memory leak in apr_poll. > I'll tag the 2.0.40 as the existing stuff tagged + this poll. > > is there any other small patches which need/should go into 40 since I > last tagged ? Looking at it from the other side: Why not tag HEAD? Was there extensive testing done on IANH_PRE1_2040 that you don't want to put at risk? Is there anything in particular after IANH_PRE1_2040 that you don't think is ready to release? It has been a while since your tag, and *just speaking personally* I'd prefer that any extra testing I do encompass all the recent changes. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
