Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >>with the recent fix to apr_poll's memory leak we can start this ball > >>rolling again.. > >> > > > >We'll need to state that it can't be used with > x Listen statements > >or explain how to build APR to allow more descriptors with no memory > >leak in apr_poll. > > > > I don't think either of those workarounds is really suitable for a > GA release. ... > The workaround that I put in yesterday will suffice for most > installations, but we'll need to revert to the previous poll > code in order to have a GA-ready server once again.
I agree 100%. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
