On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Justin and I have both given our thumbs up. The question is now where to put > > > the thing. A few people say APR, and few don't like that. A few say httpd, > > > and a few don't like that. Bleh :-) > > > > I'm 100% comfy with the landing spot being in APR, as a compliment to > > the XML routines. > > +1 from me, I prefer APR actually.
I am really uncomfortable with this going under the APR project. As things stand right now, it just doesn't fit with what we have stated our goals to be. If you want to change our stated goals, then go ahead and do it. Just committing code that doesn't fit with our goals isn't the way to do that. I will make one exception to that statement. If it lands inside of APR-util, under the XML directory, and it is made to work with the XML parser, I can accept that landing spot. As it fits in closer with our goals (I think). Jim, I can't decide if this is what you meant or not. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
