>-- Original Message -- >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:49:14 -0700 >From: Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: authn/authz split
>Do you think this new feature is well-defined enough to warrant >a new revision number? I'd like to see us start burning up new rev >numbers for things like this, to make it obvious that we are >actually adding new features (that could use some testing/usage, >and might be useful to some users). As I stated before, I agree with you. I think changes like this should trigger minor version bumps. sterling
