On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >(leaving 2.0 as head, so nobody following older checkout instructions to > >grab the now-current version have a 'surprize' in store.) > > I tend to find myself agreeing with him on this.
As Marc pointed out, that won't work with CVS. > And, because I think it is very counter-intuitive if I check out > httpd-2.0 and get "2.1" - something isn't right there. I'm sure you'll be able to grok that. Alternately the repository could be renamed to httpd-2 (as you almost suggested yourself). [...] > Look at all of the repositories we created that are still left > around: > > apache-1.2 > apache-1.3 > apache-apr > apache-nspr > httpd-2.0 > > The apache-apr and apache-nspr repositories were fairly short-lived. > I wasn't around when they were created, so perhaps the intention > really was that they would be the 'next big thing.' Not sure about apache-apr, but IIRC apache-nspr was a combination of "next big thing" and "sandbox for trying out this fancy styff". - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();
