YES!
The pattern is:
<VirtualHost>
<Directory> (and .htaccess'es within those directories)
<Files>
<Location>
with the <Limit[Except]>s parsed in the appropriate container.
We repeat <Location> because the original <Location> could
have changed in translate_name, and yes, the URI permissions
or restrictions always override any file-based permissions.
E.g., you could have a
DocumentRoot /thatpath
Alias /secure-dav/ /thatpath/
<Location /secure-dav>
Dav On
</Location>
and even though DAV is OFF in the <Directory /thatpath> ...
the server will still allow a DAV view within the /secure-dav/...
namespace.
This is how 1.3 and 2.0 have always worked.
Bill
At 06:06 PM 10/2/2002, Jerry Baker wrote:
>André Malo says:
>>Sorry, I can't believe, that it worked ever before the way you
>>described. Are you sure, that you've changed nothing else?
>
>So Location matches are even more important than .htaccess matches? That doesn't make
>sense. I would think that a directive in .htaccess is always more specific than one
>in the config files.
>
>--
>Jerry Baker
