Yes, I've been thinking of experimenting with mod_logio, but I'm a bit hesitant to hack out a patch from (or use whole-hog) CVS HEAD into a production site that gets 3 terabytes of traffic per day and I'm embarassed to admit how much revenue depends on... ;o) Thanks for the link, I'll try that. It won't be as accurate as getting the byte count without the headers, but at least it should be something better than nothing if it works as described...
If we're not going to fix %s shouldn't we at least fix the documentation to be more accurate? 2.0 and 1.3 really are quite different here. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Have you tried using mod_logio? If won't only give you the "body" bytes, but > also the "headers" bytes. It reports the number of input bytes too and should > understand encryption and compression. You can either check it out from Apache > CVS (HEAD), or download the patch for 2.0.43 here: > http://www.rexursive.com/software.html. > > You'd use it with %I (for input) and %O (for output). It would be interesting to > know if it reports accurately in the case you described...
